Of course, no one has ever been prosecuted under this theory anywhere in the United States. There isn't a category in any business records for "paying extortion", so how should it be labeled here? I am curious as to how it should have been labeled. The alleged crime as I understand it is that Trump personally labeled the payoff to Daniel's as legal services in the business records. I’m directing relevant committees to immediately investigate if federal funds are being used to subvert our democracy by interfering in elections with politically motivated prosecutions." "Kevin we go again - an outrageous abuse of power by a radical DA who lets violent criminals walk as he pursues political vengeance against President Trump. Speaker Von Papen proves that wrong: (Rick then links this crazed Kevin McCarthy tweet of less than an hour previous) That’s the line from 1000 lobbyists, major donors, and the National Review cruise ship boys. It’s time for DeSantis or Haley or Youngkin.” Every other Republican candidate for president should be asked if they’ll pardon Trump.
The most interesting place to watch the barometer will be Fox.Ħ. Anyone’s surprise he’s a fucking criminal at this point has been living in a bunker.ĥ. The gentry GOP will double down now on DeSantis, to no avail.Ĥ. The base will rally politically, and possibly physically. The arrest secures the nomination for Donald Trump.Ģ. Rick Wilson's (The Lincoln Project) Twitter feed is pure fire today.ġ. The Democrats' strategy worked perfectly. Gibbs won that primary, with the Democrats' wink/nod "support." And then Gibbs lost decisively to a relatively unknown Democrat, Hillary Scholten. TrumpWing voters for whom hearing that Gibbs was "too radical" was eggzackly wut they were lookin' fer. The ads helped Gibbs to win the primary, thanks to the TrumpWing voters. So the Democrats ran primary advertisements suggesting that Gibbs was "too radical." The Democrats knew what those ads would do. Because Meijer had voted in favor of the second Trump impeachment in the House. He ran after being recruited by TrumpWorld as punishment for Peter Meijer.
Gibbs was an African-American alumnus of the Trump Administration Dept. But we have seen how these things boost Trump's numbers among the small number of Trump-fanatics, while they also increase Trump's negatives among the much larger numbers of independents and Democrats.ĭo you perchance remember the Michigan 3rd Congressional race in 2022? It was the one where Peter Meijer, a personally respected, talented, genuinely conservative Republican first-termer was primaried by John Gibbs. But they had to put him in jail.ĭave your assertion depends upon GOP primary voters believing that an indictment (several indictments, in several jurisdictions?) is disqualifying and they will support a Republican other than Trump. With DeSantis, the GOP stands a chance of winning in 2024.
Trump will lose in the primaries to DeSantis because of this. There are enough repeated instances to be causing some deservedly terrible soul-searching among Republican leaders and voters in MI, GA, WI, PA and AZ.įor once, the Left is making a giant mistake. These repeated electoral events in which Trumpist candidates (and Trump himself!) win divisive GOP primaries and then lose in general elections are very good things.
Another grand Trump defeat in a general election after winning a divisive primary is something that would be very good for America. Yes, certainly Trump's running in a presidential race is bad for America.Īnd yes we have also clearly seen how past event like this - the Mar-a-Lago search, two impeachments - each helped Trump's popularity numbers within a base GOP plurality.
0 kommentar(er)
